Simulation prototype

What: This kind of prototype is for getting the details right for a refined, or close to final, concepts. This means that your solution is almost ready for a pilot implementation in the live context. 

Why: Prototyping is a set of quick and small-scale tests that build your understanding of your concept. It is used when you have a clear hypothesis about a new solution, but you are still unsure how exactly the new solution should be designed for implementation.
A simulation prototype re-enacts a scenario through roleplay. Physically walking someone through your proposed solution – especially if the solution is related to a specific location or service related – lets them immerse themselves in the experience and invites them to provide specific feedback. Using this method, you can collect detailed feedback to refine and validate your solution.
Simulation prototyping is especially great for engaging your stakeholders to gain their support before you bring your concept to life.

When: Prototyping is particularly relevant in the design and planning stage in the project cycle when seeking to validate a new concept, for example, in the project inception phase. But it can also be a powerful tool during implementation if new concepts are added to existing projects.

NOTE: Simulation prototyping might not be appropriate, or safe, for all kinds of project or participants. Consult your protection, gender, and inclusion and community engagement and accountability focal points or advisors if in doubt.

If you are unsure of which kind of prototype would be best to test your concept, check out the Which prototype tool here. 

Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4

Useful tips:

Simulation test in Mali

Why did you choose to use this tool and what was the challenge you wanted to address? 

We wanted to test if the mechanism we had developed worked as intended, meaning if the procedures worked in practice and if the intervention could be carried out within the time available – the latter being absolutely crucial for the success of the mechanism. At the same time, it was also an opportunity to see how the intervention would be perceived by the target community and get their immediate feedback. As the approach of the mechanism was completely new in Mali, the simulation was therefore an opportunity to test its practical feasibility, while also familiarizing the stakeholders with the approach.

What insights and learning did you get by using this tool? 

By doing the simulation exercise, we got a lot of very useful learnings. For instance, we learned that some of the activities we had planned, took longer than anticipated and we therefore had to change the focus of that activity to make it fit within the time available. We also learned something about the lines of communication and how we could tweak these to make it more efficient. By carrying out the activities during the simulation exercise, all involved actors also got to know their roles and what was expected of them. Finally, we got some confidence in the mechanism we had developed because it more or less work as intended and was welcomed by the community.

What advice would you give to other who are considering using this tool? 

Do it! It is really useful to see how things actually work in practice and not only on paper. It helps a lot to get the first learnings from a safe environment, rather than the first time you really need it. It takes quite some time to plan (depending on the size of the simulation, of course) so schedule plenty of time both before and afterwards, so that you can properly plan it but also do proper debriefings after and capture the learnings from all the stakeholders. Full-scale simulations can be expensive, but even if you have a small budget you can still do tabletop exercises that can also be very insightful.

Credits

Adapted from Designing for Public Service by IDEO and Nesta